What a useful adviser says when it is uncertain

A polished recommendation should survive questions about its evidence, assumptions and limits.

Dan Warrener

An answer you can examine

Technology proposals often arrive with confident language and a tidy plan. That can make them easy to present to a board. It does not tell you whether the important assumptions have been checked.

The useful part of an adviser’s experience is the judgement they can explain: why an option fits, what could undermine it and which evidence would make them change their mind. Saying “I do not know yet” can be the start of useful work when it comes with a way to find out.

Ask what would change the recommendation

Take a proposal to replace a reporting platform. It promises faster access to information and fewer manual reports. Before accepting the conclusion, ask where the current delay comes from. It could be the platform, the quality of the data or the approval process. Each points to a different intervention.

A useful recommendation identifies the evidence that distinguishes those explanations. For example: trace one report from source to approval, inspect the transformations and measure where it waits. Those checks are specific enough for another person to challenge or repeat.

The adviser should also be able to describe the alternative they considered. If improving the existing process could solve the immediate problem, you should know why that option was accepted or rejected.

Make uncertainty useful to the decision

A decision paper can separate what is known, what is assumed and what remains unanswered. Give each material unknown an owner and a next check. State whether it must be resolved before a commitment or can be tested safely during delivery.

For example: data-export rights may need confirming before a contract is signed. A choice between two presentation formats might be reversible during a pilot. Treating both as equally urgent wastes attention; ignoring the first can make an exit expensive.

Ask for the cost of being wrong as well as the cost of the proposed work. What can be reversed? What data or intellectual property would be difficult to move? What needs human acceptance before the next stage starts?

Choose accountability you can see

Before engaging an adviser, ask who will do the work, who will review it and who benefits from the recommendation. An adviser who also sells implementation or owns a product should make that interest clear.

You are buying judgement applied to your situation. A clear explanation of the evidence and limits gives you a better basis for that choice than a promise to have every answer.

A new article for this site. It develops one section of Edition 22 of The Strategic Edge, “Embrace Your Imperfections”, first published on LinkedIn on 7 June 2025, on the difference between a textbook answer and advice from experience, and applies it to technology decisions.

Read the original newsletter

Put this thinking to work

Tell us where the work gets stuck. A couple of sentences is enough.