An independent review before you commit

An independent technical and commercial view on a data platform, AI investment, supplier proposal or architecture before you commit.

Running an RFP where every bidder is apparently the perfect answer?

A technology proposal asks you to commit money, people and future flexibility. An independent review tests the assumptions behind that commitment against your requirements and the available evidence.

We compare architecture fit, integration, delivery capability, operating cost and exit options. The recommendation explains trade-offs and the conditions that need resolving before a decision.

TechGuidr takes no commissions or resale margins on third-party products. We also provide delivery services and own software products. Any relevant interest is disclosed, and later delivery is a separate decision and engagement.

When to bring us in

Independent senior judgement before more money is committed

Before the next significant sum goes into a plan, find out whether the plan makes sense. The review is independent of every supplier involved, and the answer can be to stop.

  • A major supplier proposal
  • A large technology investment
  • A transformation plan
  • An AI programme
  • A platform choice
  • An architecture decision
  • An internal business case
  • A plan to rebuild systems and ways of working after fast growth
  • An expensive programme senior leadership is no longer sure about

Already working with a supplier?

Is your supplier doing the job properly?

You are paying for the work but cannot see what you are getting: progress reports that never quite answer the question, quality you have no way to check, dates that keep moving. We look at what has been delivered against what was agreed, and tell you in writing where it stands.

Both sides of the table

Our senior team has held head-of, director and executive roles inside large businesses, and has led delivery in technology, consulting and professional services firms. We know what a good supplier should be doing, and what it costs the person accountable when they are not.

What we look at

The code, the architecture, the data, the delivery plan and the evidence behind the progress reports, against the contract and what you were promised.

What you get

A written report on where the work stands, what to ask the supplier for next and whether to carry on, change course or stop. You can share it with them.

Who this is built for

  • CIOs and CTOs facing a decision that is difficult to reverse
  • CEOs and boards being asked to approve significant technology spend
  • Organisations mid-way through a vendor selection that has lost objectivity
  • Leadership teams without an independent technology voice in the room

What you receive

  • A clear recommendation, with the reasoning and the trade-offs made explicit
  • Challenge of the assumptions inside the business case
  • Commercial and contractual points worth negotiating before signature
  • Direct participation in vendor sessions and board discussions where useful

How the options end up compared

Every recommendation sits on scoring you can interrogate.

Illustrative vendor scoring, each criterion rated out of three
CriterionVendor AVendor BRecommendedVendor C
Architecture fit2 of 3: Integration debt3 of 3: Strongest2 of 3: Workable
Delivery confidence1 of 3: Unproven at scale3 of 3: Proven2 of 3: Adequate
Exit and lock-in3 of 3: Clean exit3 of 3: Clean exit1 of 3: Export restricted
Five-year cost£1.7m£1.9m£2.4m incl. exit
  • Vendor BRecommended

    Architecture fit
    3 of 3: Strongest
    Delivery confidence
    3 of 3: Proven
    Exit and lock-in
    3 of 3: Clean exit
    Five-year cost
    £1.9m
  • Vendor A

    Architecture fit
    2 of 3: Integration debt
    Delivery confidence
    1 of 3: Unproven at scale
    Exit and lock-in
    3 of 3: Clean exit
    Five-year cost
    £1.7m
  • Vendor C

    Architecture fit
    2 of 3: Workable
    Delivery confidence
    2 of 3: Adequate
    Exit and lock-in
    1 of 3: Export restricted
    Five-year cost
    £2.4m incl. exit
Illustrative scoring extract. The recommendation: Vendor B, subject to three contractual changes before signature.

Typical investment

Fixed scope, fixed price

Know what the answer costs before we start. All figures ex VAT; the final fixed fee is confirmed after scoping.

Focused decision or vendor review
from £7,500
Full RFP / selection support
typically £10,000 to £30,000
Retained independent advisory
from £7,500/month

What we need from you

  • The decision deadline, evaluation criteria and business case
  • Proposals, indicative contracts, architecture and access to vendor clarification sessions
  • A decision owner and relevant commercial, operational and technical stakeholders

Scope and boundaries

  • A focused review examines one decision and an agreed set of options. A full procurement process is a larger scope.
  • Commercial contract observations are for discussion with your legal advisers.
  • The review does not commit you to delivery by TechGuidr. Any later delivery interest is disclosed.

Before you commit

Questions before you commit

What if we have already chosen a supplier?

A review can focus on the assumptions, contract conditions, implementation dependencies and exit provisions that should be resolved before you commit further.

Will you join vendor discussions?

Participation can be included. The scope sets out which sessions and which decision the review supports.

Can you look at the work of a supplier we already use?

Yes. We review what has been delivered against what was agreed: the code, the architecture, the data, the delivery plan and the evidence behind the progress reports. You get a written report on whether the work is being done properly and what to ask for next, which you can share with the supplier.

Can you review an AI supplier’s proposal?

Yes. We test what is promised against the architecture, the data it needs, the cost of running it, the contract terms and the exit, and say in writing what we would change or ask before you sign.

Should we stop or continue a programme that is running late?

The review sets out the options, including stopping, with the cost and risk of each, so the decision rests on evidence about what is left to do.

Databricks or Microsoft Fabric?

It depends on the workloads, the skills in the team, the licences you already hold and what each would cost to run at your volumes. We compare them for your case, and take no commission from either vendor.

Show us the decision you’re trying to make

Two or three sentences is enough. We will tell you straight whether and how we can help.